Home

 

 

SCSU  REFLECTIONS

 

 

I was thrilled to be admitted to the Master of Library Science Program at Southern Connecticut State University in November of 2001, but to be truthful, I was somewhat resentful that I could not pursue a career in librarianship without facing the two years of difficult coursework ahead of me.  Since I had worked in a library in the past, what seemed most essential from my point of view, was some extensive on-the-job training.  I was far from certain that I would learn enough in the MLS program to justify the huge expense.

 

Gratefully, I was mistaken in my position.  Several things make the graduate environment special.  People can, and do, obviously learn a lot on the job.  I have most of those lessons ahead of me.  One could read all the texts required in my courses without going to graduate school, and one could approach each job responsibility as I approached the projects in my classes: research the literature for evidence and opinion, examine existing examples, evaluate and synthesize all information, and produce what was required.  However, the major stumbling block to using this approach on the job is that no one has the time to complete all steps in a thorough manner.

 

Professors who are experts in their subjects definitely provide an advantage in graduate studies.  Tips on where to start searching can cut hours off the time required to for each project.   One would have to diligently develop contacts in order to experience equivilent assistance on the job.  In the MLS program, additional guidance is provided by fellow students, many of whom are already on the job.  I found my classmates to be endlessly generous in expanding my knowledge of a topic and suggesting leads.

 

The projects at SCSU were carefully designed to reflect those that students might encounter on the job.  This may or may not be a benefit specific to SCSU.  I do know that what I kept hearing from professionals who had received their degree some time ago was, “I never had to do that!”  I am grateful for SCSU’s focus because it gave me experiences I can apply to future work situations, it gave me completed projects that evidence my competence, and perhaps most importantly, it raised my confidence level significantly.

 

My coursework at SCSU started with intensity.  I enrolled in a five-week compressed version of Introduction to Information Science and Technology.  Although I wouldn’t exactly deem it a mistake, you’ll note that I never again enrolled in a winter intersession course!  I sometimes wondered if I would make it through that class, but I emerged more determined to conquer graduate school, and pleased with the increase in my technical skills.  I am also grateful that we were required to subscribe to a professional listserv.  Monitoring PUBYAC for more than two years has given me a wealth of ideas.

 

In Foundations of Librarianship, I became more aware of current issues in the field.  One focus I chose was challenges presented by the many patrons whose native language is something other than English.  Information Analysis and Organization (cataloging) is something I dreaded taking, but rising to the challenge was invigorating, and I quite enjoyed the analytical aspects of the required projects. 

 

My favorite classes were Children’s Materials and Services and its counterpart for Adolescents, not only because it directly addresses my chosen direction, but because Nancy Disbrow, more than any other professor, successfully encouraged student discussion in her course design.  Although reading all the postings took time, the student interaction served to lessen the feeling of isolation experienced in online study, and helped expand clarity on issues and expand subject knowledge significantly.  Nancy was also complimentary about my project submissions, which in a class full of students already in youth services provided a needed confidence boost.

 

My first reference class expanded my knowledge of sources, both in print and online.  I wanted to be very prepared for the general reference work that is a part of any patron service position in public libraries today, and I also wished to have something to offer in an academic position if that happened to be all that was available in the area when I completed my studies, so I continued with Advanced Reference Materials and Services.  The class included electronic design work that was invaluable as a precursor to final Portfolio preparation.

 

Last summer was an interesting one.  An Education Foundations class and Acquisitions complemented each other in some respects.  I credit the first with sharpening my instructional skills and preparing me to understand educational viewpoints in the collaborative work I believe to be essential.  Although I had moved out into the real world in Nancy Disbrow’s classes with program design and presentation, it was Acquisitions that required me to interact with local librarians to complete projects in government documents, local acquisition practices, and collection evaluation.  Although online education is a good fit for me, I was actually on campus for two of the weeks that semester, and it was wonderful to interact with students, some of whom I had met online, and to meet many professors in person.  While I was there, I furthered my storytelling skills in ILS 695, and increased my knowledge of online resources in ILS 695.

 

Although I did not apply for credit for my three-month position with Sno-Isle Libraries last fall, I certainly consider it part of my educational experience.  As children’s liaison, I designed and presented preschool programs, mastered an automation system, and practiced my reference skills.  Display knowledge developed in retail work was also put to good use.  Collaboration with the local schools crystallized the ideas that would become my Capstone Research Project.  The job provided the current practical experience I thought might be essential to a successful job hunt once I had my degree, and I loved my responsibilities and performed them with confidence, evidencing the fine preparation my courses had given me, and validating the choices I had made and the time, effort, and dollars spent.

Although I dreaded the looming capstone project requirement through most of my MLS tenure, I have to say that ILS 680 Evaluation & Research provided some invaluable experiences. In the first place, the open-ended nature of the work provides a reason and an opportunity to do indepth research in areas of personal interest within the information field. I was able to combine interests in outreach, instruction, promotion and young adult service into a single comprehensive project. The class underlines the importance of basing professional action on research and evaluation, a focus that is too often lacking in the field. Because one seldom finds exactly what was expected, data collection provides the relatively rare opportunity to be reminded that there is a difference between prediction based on experience and limited observation, and evidence collected systematically. So despite the challenges provided by the capstone project,in reflection, I am grateful for the experience.

In this reflective essay, I have obviously only touched on a few highlights.  Further information about the projects done in each course, and the projects themselves can be accessed through the homepage.  Another page documents the evolution of my Capstone Research Project, and provides access to the research report.   It has been a difficult journey, but I leave the MLS program at SCSU confident that I can meet any professional challenges that come my way, and ready to work toward expanded and clarified versions of the goals that were important to me when I began.


Home